Monday , April 22 2019
Home / unitedstates / Congressional negotiators say they have reached an agreement in principle to prevent shutdowns.

Congressional negotiators say they have reached an agreement in principle to prevent shutdowns.



The four bipartisan negotiator delegates from Monday evening talks did not mention the details of how the settlement was made or the exact parameters of the transaction, but when asked if they include a solution to the barrier funding and detention issues, Senate appropriations Richard Shelby "We all agreed," said Richard Shelby.

Shelby's remarks follow the remarks of a Democratic aide who participated in border security negotiations. They said early negotiators were "very close" to the negotiations and said they are now confirming that the proposed proposal will get the necessary votes to pass the negotiations. House.

Members of Parliament are racing in Parliament to find common ground for the National Assembly's security assurance agreement. The president will sign the bill to pass border security and prevent the closure of another partial government on Friday at midnight.

About 25 percent of federal funds will expire this weekend, and bipartisan members are in meetings for a few weeks to negotiate border security as part of the Department of Homeland Security budget.

Although the talks seemed to be on the way to the end of the truce, the top Democrats and four Republicans in the House and Senate Appropriations Council met on Monday. Intermediate trading.

Republican Senator Kay Granger of the conference committee said, "We will have slept tonight."

"It always helps decision-making," he added.

The scarce deadline dates from December, when President Donald Trump signed a bill to temporarily resume the closure of the government for three weeks to allow border security negotiations. It was a long terminator.

The president 's willingness to accept remains a wild card hanging from the negotiations. Democrats and Republicans in Capitol Hill have long signaled that they can trade if they leave it on their devices, but questions about the president's acceptance continue to inject uncertainty into the process.

Speaking Monday night at El Paso in Texas, Trump said he knew about the contract but did not hear from the torturer.

"They say progress is taking place, just as you know, right now, right now," he said. "I just said I should take care of people from Texas, I do not want to hear about it, I do not want to hear about it."

White House officials in Washington, White House officials, according to what the congressional negotiating delegates think about one more recent thought. That is, negotiations that depend on the will of the commission – additional barriers to using other federal funds.

White House officials say they will release options now, including Trump, using their executive powers to reassign federal funds to the wall elsewhere, but they have an agreement now.

As Mick Mulvaney, acting director of staff, said on Sunday at NBC, he is "trying to find additional funds" for the law. White House officials think this is an option even if the president signs a deal to avoid another government closure.

It was revealed that the talks were suspended only a few hours ago, but there was no major concern for the White House officials. They are continuing discussions on the declaration of national emergency for several days.

Democratic chief negotiator Patrick Leahy said on Thursday that a major negotiator would start negotiations on Monday night and then draft a final agreement Tuesday.

Vermont's Leahy said of his work with Shelby: "If we can finish this tonight, we all agree.

Now all agreements must be made in the House and Senate, and eventually in the White House.

Democratic aide said he has "a lot of work to do" if the settlement is yet to be made on the floor.

Relevant Republican advisors have expressed some attention to the progress due to repeated bankruptcies over the past few weeks, but negotiators have obviously moved in the right direction.

Another GOP advisor said, "I heard a good thing tonight."

The most important point in the closure battle so far has been the president's request for more than $ 5 billion on the border walls. The Democratic Party made it clear that it was a non-inspectionee and could not accept the president's request.

Another stubbornness has arisen about the problem of detention for imprisoned immigrants. The Democratic Party sees detention centers as the core of a harsh, unnecessary aggressive Trump administration immigration policy. The Republican Party focuses on restraining beds to limit the release of detained undocumented immigrants to the United States while they wait for a hearing.

The Democrats have entered into negotiations to reduce the number of prisons funded by the measure to 35,520, and the number of White House and Republicans has increased to 52,000.

Details of the interim agreement reached Monday evening were not disclosed publicly. However, according to Democratic sources, at this point in principle, the Convention included $ 1.355 billion in physical barriers, including 40,520 for all ICE beds that do not meet the 52,000 required by the administration and do not match the current level of financing It is.

"I will never sign a bill that forces violence as a weapon of mass destruction," Trump told the El Paso crowd about the potential limit on ICE detention centers. "We will not abolish the great hero," he said. ICE and border patrol and law enforcement. "

A spokesman for the Democratic Senate in North Carolina, David Price, said before the end of the government funding deadline on February 15th that a meeting of both sides could get something on the president 's desk if agreed on Monday night.

"Before the consensus is announced, Price says," We know that the price is the goal of reaching tonight. "Through serious abandonment, goodwill and negotiations, we hope to come back now."

This story has been updated since Monday.


Source link