The strongest opposition to genetically engineered foods, according to fellow research papers published in the January journal, is that I think I know a lot about food science, but I actually think I know the least. Natural human behavior.
GMOs are widely believed to be safe by scientists, but others say they want more science for potential harm because subjective arguments are not part of the equation. However, according to previous surveys, providing the scientific facts about GMOs to people does not change their minds.
The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified foods, what their views were and how intense they were.
We then continued to ask true or false questions about a series of science, from basic questions such as whether the core of the earth was hot or cold, to genetics questions such as "Are there genes in tomatoes without genes?"
As a result, the more people against GMOs, the lower the test score.
"Many people got angry about genetically modified foods," said Sydney Scott, a marketing professor at Washington University in St. Louis, one of the schools that conducted the study.
"We need to teach people new things and recognize the difference in knowledge before they make meaningful discussions," she added.
Opponents of genetically modified foods do not have much inventory in the study.
Alexis Baden-Mayer, director of political affairs at the GMO Organic Consumer Association, said, "Actually defective science is that the Food and Drug Administration does not rigorously test GM foods.
She said her organization would like to see a thorough scientific review of genetically modified foods using up-to-date testing practices.
Scott spokesman Baden-Mayer pointed out that the study emphasized that not only the science of GMOs but also the correlation between scientific knowledge and consumer behavior. "Consumers are less likely to learn the truth when they feel enthusiastic about the fact that they feel they are challenging their moral values," she said.
"People may feel extreme about genetically modified foods because they are very unnatural in a virtually morally provocative way," Scott said.
Researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder, the University of Toronto, and the University of Pennsylvania were also subsidized by the National Science Foundation.
They plan to conduct further research into how the results could affect other controversial scientific issues such as vaccination, nuclear and homeopathic medicine.